Showing posts with label world government. Show all posts
Showing posts with label world government. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

World Government, in Today's News 01.27.10

World Government. Ensuring that national banks act in a unified international manner on bank reform and thereby move toward world government that would dictate such action, is the order of the day at the Davos, Switzerland conference this week.

The Institute of International Finance, an influential organization that represents the Rothschild interests and speaks for international banks and other financial institutions, made clear on the eve of Davos, according to the Wall Street Journal, that "go-it-alone moves by governments to regulate big banks are in danger of fragmenting the global financial system."

Independent regulatory action by nations is a matter of great concern to the Rothschilds and other owners of the world's wealth because 1) it mucks up the wealth production of these families, and 2) it is a step away from the over-riding aim of developing a world government. The Rothschilds and their cohorts are therefore making a big push at Davos.

William Rhodes of Citigroup and a leading figure in the IIF revealed the frustration with lack of international coordination: "Almost every day now, we are seeing policy decisions and announcements that are not being coordinated and have the potential of doing systemic damage."

The IIF "reiterated past warnings that regulators should be aware of the cumulative costs of all their separate initiatives...which could combine to constrain bank lending" (WSJ) and thereby constrain bank profit-making from bank-lending.

As the discerning can see, world government is a matter of economic necessity for the world bank owners to ensure a ever-growing rate of profit. Moving in the direction of this world body is a matter of some urgency. Rhodes "said it was important to move quickly lest momentum for change was lost..." 

In general the world wealth owners are looking to the G-20 organization to be the genesis of their world government. The G-20 is an international coming together of representatives of the 20 largest economies. The Rothschilds and others are working hard to encourage the G-20 leaders to transform themselves into a world governing body for economics. Already some steps have been taken by the G-20.

The IIF is looking to the Davos conference to be a stepping stone to the next G-20 meeting in November. Rhodes stressed that the Davos group needed to implement guidelines by the time of the G-20 conference. Rhodes, "That will be a test of the whole G-20 process."

Various political commentators seldom speak of the possibility of world government. But the process continues. Step by step, the Rothschilds and their friends are moving to establish their world governing body (read dictatorship). Someday we will wake up and there it will be.

Wednesday, October 7, 2009

World Government, in Today's News 10.05.09

World Government. The Cryptocracy is moving quickly (and quietly) to set up the framework for the beginnings of their world government. The recent G-20 meeting decided to crown themselves as the directorate for the world in the first step toward a full-fledged world government. The G-20 will now sit in judgement of each country's economy and make appropriate recommendations on how to improve. The G-20 decided that the International Monetary Fund will provide the staff and administration (and also the enforcement) for the G-20 decisions.

The IMF annual meeting is occurring now, and they are dutifully proceeding to create what the G-20 wanted. Today's Wall Street Journal (page A10): "Among tasks already assigned to the IMF is the analysis of plans by G-20 nations to boost growth and monitoring whether nations are carrying them out. Along with the Financial Stabilization Board, an organization of central bankers and regulators, the IMF will preform similar work on regulatory proposals. The G-20 is also counting on the IMF to develop early warnings of asset bubbles and other major problems."

Unbeknownst to the world's population, this process is very far along. While it seems like a lot of busy work now and has the 'justification' of solving the economic crisis, the reality in the long run is that this process will result in the world dictatorship of the Cryptocracy. It will mean the end of Christian civilization.

The Cryptocracy and the apparatus it is developing are deadly (literally) enemies of the Church. One can pray for the Church leaders to wake up and to recognize the attack against the Church. One can also pray for a leader(s) who will tell the truth and fight uncompromisingly against the attempt to eliminate Christ's teachings and legacy.

*********
October 7 postscript. The IMF efforts to organize itself to serve the G-20 includes rearranging the governing structure of the IMF. Such change is frightening to some of the members of IMF. For example, Saudi Arabia. Today's Wall Street Journal (page A10): "Saudi Arabia is negotiating a substantial contribution to the International Monetary Fund in large part to assure its ownership share of the fund isn't reduced." The amount is around $10 billion.

Big changes are quietly rolling ahead. Is anyone in the Church even aware of what is going on?


Monday, September 28, 2009

World Government, in Today's News 09.26.09

World Government. As expected the leaders of the G-20 nations announced Friday that they will now subject their individual economic policies to the review by each other nation.

The newspaper commentaries stress that the new arrangement lacks enforcement mechanisms.

Several comments:

1. Stressing lack of enforcement is just a soft-sell of the plan. The idea is to convince the public that this is all a collaborative academic undertaking that will have no influence on peoples' lives. 

2. Stressing lack of enforcement is simultaneously a building of the groundwork for the really serious enforcement that is to come.

3. Finally, it is all malarky that there is no enforcement. Say you are Argentina and the other countries are critical of your policy. Standing up to that pressure would be very difficult, and moreover, to do so would invite war.

The International Monetary Fund is projected as the organization that does the reviewing of national economic policies. As is well-known the IMF has very effective enforcement mechanisms that surely would be used in this new arrangement.

Friday, September 25, 2009

World Government, in Today's News 09.25.09

World Government. Leaders of the world's leading twenty economies are about to take a decisive step toward the new world order and toward a world government that can over-rule national governments. Will anyone sound the alarm?

Today's Wall Street Journal details the plan in a page one article. The lead paragraph: "The Group of 20 nations is close to an agreement that would require [!!] members to subject their economic policies to a type of 'peer review'..."

"Also, the G-20 heads of state will announce Friday that the G-20 will become the permanent [!!] council for international economic cooperation, eclipsing the Group of Eight..."

"The potential agreement envisions a procedure where G-20 countries assess whether each others' policies are working, and the International Monetary Fund provides technical help." [Emphases added.] The agreement does not yet include enforcement mechanisms.

This agreement is the foundation event for a qualitative transformation of the world. The Talmudic and Masonic goal of a world government is now so much closer to realization.

The agreement calls for monitoring of national governments' economic policy. But once one monitors economic policy, one will eventually control economic policy and everything else. It will only be a matter of time until the formality of a governing oversight of all political and economic national policies is adopted.

The agreement says each country will monitor other countries. Fat chance of that happening. No, an international apparatus will be set up that does the monitoring and formulates the changes to be made by national governments. It is not hard to figure out which philosophical outlook will dominate such an apparatus.

The cryptocracy will be overjoyed at this development. They precipitated the economic crisis in part to set an atmosphere where an international governing body could be established, no matter how preliminary. And they have achieved their goal.

What enables the cryptocracy to get away with this step is the absence of an organized opposition. Most everyone, who might be expected to expose and challenge a world government, has been bamboozled by all the propaganda about saving the world economy. Even the Pope, who speaks for billions, actually came out in his last encyclical in favor of creating such an international oversight body. Never mind that a world government would be a disaster for the faithful and the rest of the world's population.

This is a sad day for humanity. Some time in the future, leaders will mark this event as the beginning of the final march to the new world order.

Is there an authoritative leader in today's world who will stand up against the danger? Is there a Joan of Arc today who is willing to fight for rulership of Christ the King and against the rule of the almighty dollar?

Monday, September 21, 2009

World Government, in Today's News 09.21.09

World Government. If anyone thinks that talk of a cryptocracy drive to establish a world government now is the product of a fevered imagination, try reading today's Wall Street Journal.

This quote is from a front page, top of page article on the G-20 summit, "The G-20 summit, the third such gathering in a year [!!], is shaping up as a test of whether industrialized and developing nations can function as a board of directors for the global economy." [!!!!!!][Emphasis added.]

"Leaders are working on ways to enforce commitments countries make..."

And from a page-two article: "This week, leaders of the world's 20 largest economies will launch a debate over how new financial rules can prevent a repeat of the Great Panic." 

"...global policy makers [exactly who are these people?] have sketched the outlines of a plan that will penalize risk-taking in a number of ways." [!!][Emphasis added.]

"'Implementation is always the issue,' says Timothy Adams, a former senior Bush Treasury official. 'If we wait even one more year, it may be too late [!!!!].' The sense of urgency will have faded, he says."

And so, another goal that the cryptocracy had in mind when they precipitated the economic crisis was to stampede the leading nations and the world's population into accepting a big jump to a world government, if not to the government itself. The first step is to establish some world agency that has authority to over-rule national governments on economic policy. When that agency is institutionalized, then the cryptocracy can move on to controlling political policies.

*****

Also today we learn that the cryptocracy is about to renew its drive to establish a world body that can govern environmental policies of national states. Page A8 of the WSJ today: "More than 100 world leaders, including Mr. Obama and Chinese President Hu Jintao, are scheduled to meet Tuesday at the 64th United Nations Genera Assembly to talk about fighting climate change..."

"U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has made global warming a focus, and he is worried that the meeting won't move the ball forward toward a new global climate-change treaty in Copenhagen this December..."

******

So, hold onto your hats. The cryptocracy is moving rapidly, determinedly, and with all due diligence to establishing their world government.

Have no doubt of this!! We are very close to the nightmare that humanity has feared for centuries, the unaccountable global iron fist.

Friday, July 17, 2009

Obama, in Today's News 07.16.09

Obama. During the presidential election one got the impression that the cryptocracy had bigger plans for Obama than just the USA presidency. Witness his speech in Berlin to many thousands before the election.

Now read this paragraph (Wall Street Journal, page A11, today) from Daniel Henninger, deputy editor of the WSJ Editorial Page: "On his just-completed foreign trip, he [Obama] gave a major address in Moscow reinterpreting the Cold War and another in Ghana laying out a persuasive path to prosperity for the African continent. In June he gave a major speech on Islam's place in history and its relationship to the rest of the world, spoke the next day on the meaning of Buchenwald and a day later about D-Day at Normandy. He seems to be on the TV every day, talking."

This paragraph describes not someone who is a president of the United States, but someone who is using that post to become president of the world.

Saturday, June 20, 2009

World Government, in Today's News 06.20.09

World Government. The cryptocracy keeps trying to take a decisive step toward world government. Any little step would be okay by them. All that is needed is for some agency to be given authority over individual nations. 

The primary obstacle for the cryptocracy is what they see as provincialism. It is particularly galling to the cryptocracy when their own employees exhibit such provincialism, as in today's case. 

Yesterday the European Union tried to set up a European Systemic Risk Council. This group would assess financial entities. The goal was for the Risk Council to make financial-sector rescues of companies in any European country deemed to be a risk to the EU economy. Such power is exactly what the cryptocracy was looking to establish.

It didn't work out that way. Yet. WSJ: "But, largely due to pressure from the United Kingdom, the body [the risk council] would only be advisory. Final decisions on financial-sector rescues would rest with the national governments called on to fund them."

Quite a disappointment, especially when the pressure to water down the proposal came from Rothschild-land, the United Kingdom.

But all is not compromised. French President Nicolas Sarkozy: "We've created a new EU institution from scratch...We could have gone further, but I believe that it will widen [its powers] through experience and practice, the way it's always happened." The WSJ comments, "EU institutions and policies have often begun small and gathered powers over time."

Ah yes, the cryptocracy in action. They just keep working the system until they get what they want, all the while never telling the public what the ultimate goal is.

POSTSCRIPT, 06.21.09.  An alternate explanation for the above is that the Rothschild interests were worried about continental Europeans, who the Rothschilds have less confidence in, interfering in the Rothschild-English-banking empire via the Risk Council. Thus Rothschilds  decided to hold off on empowering the Risk Council until they are better assured that it will be in their control and work in their interests.

The real explanation may be something else. Who knows? The cryptocracy secrecy makes it difficult to know. The main point, however, is that a key step toward the world government was delayed.

Friday, June 19, 2009

World Government, in Today's News 06.19.09

World Government. If anyone thinks the goal of world government is a long-term goal of the cryptocracy and doesn't have much immediate impact, think again.

Today's WSJ has an opinion piece by one Peter Mandelson. Mandelson is Britain's business secretary. He was also the EU Trade Commissioner from 2004 to 2008. IOW, he is a key player for the cryptocracy.

What does he have to say? "We need much greater global coordination of financial regulation, facing up to systemic risk and ensuring that market participants are not able to play one regulatory jurisdiction against another...the only way to preserve a global growth model based on the huge benefits of dynamic markets is to regulate it better."

What brings this all about? "But what enabled the banking crisis to happen was a structural imbalance in the growth model of the global economy over the last two decades." The WSJ summarizes in a head: "The crisis reveals the weakness of nation-based regulation."

So there you have it. To paraphrase: Nations that only regulate themselves 'enabled' the banking crisis. Obviously what is needed is some form of global regulation of national economies; a global regulation that has bite.

One key cryptocrat or another is always publicizing this theme. What is missing so far is a concrete proposal on how to achieve the regulation. That will be coming.