Showing posts with label holocaust. Show all posts
Showing posts with label holocaust. Show all posts

Friday, October 16, 2009

Catholic Church, in Today's News 10.14.09

Catholic Church. The Judaization of the Church continues apace. The Vatican has announced that Benedict XVI will visit the Rome synagogue and meet with the city's Jewish community in January.

The Pope did not wake up one morning and decide to make this visit. For someone of the stature of the Pope, a meeting such as this one, requires months of discussion, planning and arrangement-setting between the respective staffs. That all this occurred is indicated by the date chosen, which is a Jewish commemoration.

One would think the Church situation was just fine, and therefore important staff time can be spent on a visit to the Rome synagogue. But as any school child knows, the seminaries are still shutting down, religious have almost disappeared, pews are empty, etc. All these issues deserve the overriding attention of the central Church figures, and this doesn't even mention world events such as the economic crisis, threats of war, etc.

No, Benedict doesn't seem to prioritize what would seem to be the central Church problems. He has set a course to make nice to the those who follow the Talmud. Benedict has set an example through his actions for the whole Church that 'reconciliation' with the Rabbis is task number one. As a result the insidious influence of the Talmud creeps into the Church.

The Church has 2,000 years of experience on the questions of Judaization. Yet, Benedict, who presumably knows something about history, conveniently throws out all the Church experience without even a reference to it.

The humorous part of all this is: no matter how much Benedict does to please the Rabbis, it is still not enough. In his recent trip to Israel several influential figures among the Rabbis simply tore apart Benedict and especially his remarks on the holocaust.

Here's a list of what Benedict has done during his Papacy to show his support for Judaization: (the list mostly comes from an article by John Thavis at Catholic News Service)

** Visited the main New York synagogue.

** Visited the main Cologne, Germany synagogue.

** Visited Auschwitz.

** Traveled to Israel.

** Went to the wailing wall.

** Met holocaust survivors at the holocaust memorial in Jerusalem.

Also, there seems to be a steady stream of Judaic leaders to the Vatican to speak with Benedict.

Friday, June 12, 2009

Maurice Pinay Blog on the Shooting at the US Holocaust Museum

Shooting at Holocaust Museum. The author of the Maurice Pinay blog has an item worth reading on the shooting at the US Holocaust Museum. It may be read here.

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

In Today's News 05.13.09

1.  The new government-controlled economy.  (WSJ) "The Obama administration has begun serious talks about how it can change compensation practices across the financial-services industry, including at companies that did not receive federal bailout money...Administration and regulatory officials are looking at various options, including using the Federal Reserve's supervisory powers..."

Such intervention would have been inconceivable just a year ago.  It shows how far the Obama regime has instituted a government-controlled economy.  Think about it:  we now have the federal government dictating to the central economic units of the American system how and what those units will pay their key employees. Unbelievable.

The main point here is not about executive pay.  No matter what measures may be put in place, the cryptocracy will ensure that its key employees receive a good share of the loot.  That's one reason they have lawyers -- to find the loopholes.

The main point is the cryptocracy wants to have absolute control of the banking (and other) sectors so that financial risk is minimized.  As Barney Frank, House Financial Services Committee Chairman, put it (as paraphrased by the WSJ) the committee "...is working on legislation that could strengthen the government's ability both to monitor compensation and to curb incentives that threaten a company's viability or pose a systemic risk to the economy."  (Emphasis added.)

It should also be noted that one of the projected control mechanisms is the Federal Reserve, a privately owned entity that just happens to operate in the interests of the world's richest families.  Empowering the Fed is this manner is part of a pattern in this economic crisis to put more and more governing power directly in the hands of the cryptocracy's ruling families.

2.  Pope in Israel.  There is a dog-product commercial on the tube these days about how dogs always want more, more, more.  But Benedict's visit to Israel illustrates another group who always, without fail, wants more.

Here we have the one of most pro-Judaic Popes in the history of the Church.  He and John Paul II are the prime developers of Shoah Catholicism which holds the holocaust to be more important to humanity than the crucifixion.  Benedict's papacy has seen all kinds of friendly gestures to the Judaic interests.  And now he makes a trip to the holy land and Israel.  He makes his de rigueur obeisance at the Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial.  He makes a speech against anti-semitism and in memory of the holocaust victims.

And what happens?  The director and board chairman of Yad Vashem and the parliament speaker issued public rebukes of the Pope.  They criticized the Pope's address because of "failing to specify the number of Jews that perished in the Holocaust, not singling out the Germans or Nazis as the culpable party, and failing to issue an explicit apology." (Quotation is the WSJ wordage in their article.)  The Pope was also accused of being a member of the Hitler Youth Corps. 

The Pope will evidently never learn this lesson, but one can never expect charity, forgiveness, or gratitude from those educated and trained in the Talmud.  The Talmud-inspired standard operating procedure is vengeance, getting the upper hand, and more, more, more.  In the case of the Church, it seems they will not be satisfied until the Church does exactly as they say. 

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Cardinal O'Malley on the Holocaust

If there is any doubt that the holocaust has replaced the crucifixion in importance in the Catholic Church, please read this news report from Boston.com. 

Therein Boston Cardinal O'Malley is quoted as saying that the holocaust was "the worst crime in human history." (!!)  

His declaration almost defies comment.  Consider what we have here:  the Cardinal in one of the most important Catholic cities in the world (at least historically) considers the holocaust in world war II to be more important than the crucifixion of Jesus.  The crucifixion of the Lord and Savior of humanity, a crime that rocked the cosmos and reshaped human history, is not as important as the holocaust?   

It is hard to find a more graphic example in all of the Church history that shows such a capitulation to Judaic interests.  And an extreme capitulation it is:  denying the central importance of the very foundation of the Church that O'Malley purports to represent. 

The Judaic campaign in the aftermath of the lifting of the excommunications of the SSPX bishops has indeed been successful.  Church officials of the highest ranks of the Church hierarchy are now boldly and publicly asserting the religion of holocaustianity.

Prayers are greatly needed for the Church and its leaders, especially Cardinal O'Malley.

Friday, February 20, 2009

Williamson and the Church Were Set Up

The events following the lifting of the excommunications of the Society of Saint Pius X bishops can lead one to the conclusion that Bishop Williamson was set up to enable an attack on the church.  This operation was intended to: 

*  Discredit the lifting of the excommunications, 

*  Anathematize the traditional Catholic current, 

*  Embarrass and disparage the Pope and the Church, 

*  Establish belief in the "official" holocaust version  as de facto church dogma, and

*  Further entwine the Pope in the Judaic web.

All these aims were achieved, largely because the Pope, the Church, the SSPX, and the traditional Catholics failed to recognize an attack when it occurred, turned their back on the one being used to facilitate the attack, and in general adopted a stance of the most craven sycophancy toward the Judaic attackers.  

The set-up of Williamson would not have been hard to accomplish.  It was generally known that the excommunications were to be lifted.  Williamson's views were also known.  All that was necessary was to locate Williamson, find a friendly reporter, and arrange for a innocent question to be asked about something Williamson had said a few years ago.  [I had a link to an article that described how the lesbian movement arranged for the above question.  Unfortunately I misplaced the link.]

Williamson gave as minimalist an answer as he could, being fully cognizant of European laws on holocaust denial.  But enough was said for the Judaic campaign to be launched.  They had him on current public record on the eve of the lifting of the excommunications.

As soon as the Vatican released the recision of the excommunications, the world wide network of Judaic spokesmen, organizations, and media went into high gear.  It was truly breath-taking to see the extent of the campaign.  The Pope was caught unawares and then reacted in the worst way, making simply ridiculous statements on the holocaust.  (See Maurice Pinay's answer to the Pope, linked below.)  Moreover the Pope and everyone else ignored their obligation to defend a duly recognized Bishop of the Church.

Then when the full measure of the Judaic campaign became manifest, the Pope, Cardinal Bertone, and Cardinal George made statements to the effect that unless one believed in the holocaust (official version) one could not be a Catholic.  

The Judaic interests thus had achieved a great victory:  An authoritative public endorsement of their myth, by the Church no less.

Benedict's actions had further dire consequences.  By not defending Williamson, he in effect gave his by-my-leave for these Judaic interests to go after Williamson.  This they have done with a vengeance.  Three countries now are ready to arrest him. Argentina yesterday gave him an expulsion order.  Thus, the Judaic interests now have Williamson on the run and their intent is pursue him until they have him in prison, humiliated and silenced.

Stop for a moment and contemplate what has happened.  The Church is standing by in silence while enemies of the Church heartlessly and with deadly intent attack a Bishop in good standing in the Church.  

Williamson is now reported to have gone underground undoubtedly to plan and organize how he can defend himself when he has been abandoned by those who should have helped him.  One cannot fault Williamson for whatever steps he may have to take to protect himself from the legal assault and possible physical attacks.

Michael Hoffman has suggested that Williamson may be relatively safe if he comes to the United States.  This may be true.  Hopefully there are serious men of Christ who will provide aid and comfort to Williamson in his fight for survival.

Please pray for Bishop Williamson in his time of dire need!

Michael Hoffman Answers Michael Matt

Michael Hoffman on his blog "On the Contrary" has written a powerful rejoinder to Michael Matt who composed a horrifying article/editorial, "Holocaust Revisionism", in response to the Williamson situation.  Hoffman's essay should be read widely.  It may be found at: http://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2009/02/michael-hoffman-answers-michael-matt-of.html

Thursday, February 19, 2009

Bishop Williamson's Plight

The controversy over the rescinding of the excommunications of the Society of St Pius X bishops and over Bishop Williamson's remarks on the holocaust has subsided somewhat in recent days.  But no one, least of all the SSPX, should be deceived about his situation.

Make no mistake:  Williamson now has a great big bull's-eye on his back. 

Those who should be defending him have all abandoned him.  Benedict XVI has in effect thrown Williamson to the wolves.  Bishop Fellay, the head of Williamson's own SSPX, has told Williamson to drop the "nonsense", ordered him to not say more, and now there is a rumor that Fellay has given Williamson one month to recant.  Michael Matt, one of the principle leaders of the Catholic traditionalists, has written a scurrilous attack on Williamson that effectively reads him out of the traditionalist ranks. 

The wolves, of course, are the world-wide network that promotes the "official" version of the holocaust.  You can be sure that right now there are thousands of people in all parts of the world who are working night and day to find a way to prosecute Williamson, put him in prison, and throw away the key.  Already three countries are ready to arrest him for "holocaust denial."  Today it is reported that Argentina is expelling Williamson within ten days.

The failure of the Vatican, the SSPX and Matt to defend Williamson is unconscionable.  Do they not recognize that the attacks on Williamson are an attack on the Church? And that if the effort to prosecute Williamson is successful, it will weaken the Church?  Don't they realize that there are powerful forces whose hatred of the Church is so great that they will use anything to destroy it?  Don't the Church leaders feel an obligation to try to fend off such attacks?

The answer to all these questions has been emphatically "NO!"  It seems they only want to accommodate the attackers and are content to let Williamson fry.  Such an orientation is short sighted at best and completely bankrupt.

Bishop Fellay, to his great discredit, has forced Williamson into his current defensive posture which is untenable.  Thus he has refrained by order from further comment and has indicated that he will review the evidence for his earlier assertions.  This stance will not work.  There are influential forces working heartlessly to do him in, no matter what he says about reviewing his views.  Their goal is to prosecute him unmercifully or through unrelenting pressure to force him to abjectly repent.  

Bishop Williamson is now in a fight for his survival.  Being forced to lay low or duck the battle by the SSPX leaves him extremely vulnerable.  His only real alternative, absent repudiating his views, is to fight back. Unfurl his banner, elaborate his views, see who salutes, rally his troops, explain what the attack on him is all about.  He needs to explain that the attack on him, regardless of his own views, is an attack on the Church, and that he stands unequivocally in defense of the Church. Hopefully Fellay will soon recognize that the attack on Williamson is also directed at him, the SSPX, and the Church, and allow Williamson to take the necessary steps to defend himself.

Bishop Williamson needs the support of all conscientious Catholics at this time. Prayers for Bishop Williamson are an urgent necessity.  Also, prayers for those in the church who choose to turn their heads the other way during Williamson's torment. 

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Maurice Pinay: "Bad Advice from the Pope"

Pope Benedict XVI released a statement on January 28, 2009 regarding the holocaust controversy.  The Pope's action was generated by extensive criticism from within the Church and from Judaic and other sources regarding his rescinding of excommunications of four Bishops in the Society of Saint Pius X.  Much of the criticism centered on quotes by Bishop Williamson, one of the four.  Bishop Williamson had been quoted in the media stating his belief that the number of Jews killed in the holocaust was no greater that 200-300,000, and that no gas chambers had been used to exterminate Jews.  


The Pope's statement demonstrates that the Church hierarchy gives total credence to the 'official' version of the holocaust.  The identification with this myth is so thorough that the holocaust has taken on an importance in the Vatican's eyes that seems to be at least equal to Calvary and the resurrection itself. 


The author of the Maurice Pinay Blog has written an eloquent and cogent response to the Pope's statement.  The Pinay response captures in a few brief paragraphs the misconception underpinning the Pope's remarks and points to a central problem that the Church faces today.  This response deserves the widest possible circulation among those who are concerned about the direction of the Church especially since Vatican II.


A media report on the Pope's statement and the Pinay response may be found at:  http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2009/01/bad-advice-from-pope.html