Showing posts with label al Qaeda. Show all posts
Showing posts with label al Qaeda. Show all posts

Monday, November 2, 2009

Hillary Clinton, in Today's News 11.02.09

Hillary Clinton. She's done it again. Another disastrous trip as Secretary of State to foreign lands. Clinton is proving to be one of the worst Secretaries of State in the nation's history.

1). Clinton made her first official trip to Pakistan to, as the Wall Street Journal put it, "to smooth relations strained by terms of an American aid package for the key South Asian ally."  WSJ: "Clinton said she will seek to clarify issues related to the aid during her meetings with Pakistani officials...while also working to forge closer economic, diplomatic and cultural ties."

And so, what happened?  "A stream of people grilled Mrs. Clinton on the merits of a new multibillion-dollar US aid bill for Pakistan that they claimed was tailored to constrain Islamabad's military and nuclear programs. Lahore university students argued that the Pentagon's drone strikes against Taliban and al Qaeda militants in Pakistan's tribal regions were increasingly causing violence to spill out into their country's major cities and urban areas."

Of course, Clinton took the bait, lost her cool, and insulted her hosts. "In a particularly blunt exchange, Mrs. Clinton told a gathering of newspaper editors that the US didn't believe Pakistan's government had done all it could to hunt al Qaeda leaders...whom Washington believes are still hiding in the tribal areas bordering Afghanistan."

In other words, Clinton succeeded in doing just the opposite of her stated goal of smoothing relations.

In her defense, it is possible that Clinton was set up by the Obama team. Obama's people were surely aware of the Pakistan discontent with the new aid package. They could have reasoned, 'send Clinton and let her take the heat.' It's a lose-lose situation for her, and a winner for the Obama people.

2). After the Pakistan debacle, Clinton travelled to mid-east for two days "aimed at getting the Palestinians and the Israelis to return to peace talks..." (WSJ). To which one can only comment, 'you got to be kidding!!'

Clinton thinks that she can swoop in for a couple of days and the forces who have been battling for decades will suddenly recognize her superior wisdom and return to negotiations.

Even so, she managed to screw things up a bit further. She positioned herself closer to the Israeli policy of settlements, and as a result the Palestinians strengthened their resolve to stay away from negotiations.

In other words, Clinton achieved just the opposite of what she set out to do.

The media, of course, gives her every break. But, the Obama team knows all the better why it is crucial to keep her away from the administration's key foreign policy discussions and actions.

One other comment: in reading Clinton's various statements on these trips, it becomes clear that her knowledge of the situations is no greater than what one would get from reading the New York Times and the Washington Post. 

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Afghanistan, in Today's News 10.05.09

Afghanistan. Is the Obama team actually considering declaring victory in Afghanistan and reducing the American presence? The reportage of the administration debate on strategy for Afghanistan indicates that a foundation for this alternative is being built.

Today's Wall Street Journal (page one): Some in the administration discussion advocate a "campaign consisting of missile strikes and covert action inside Pakistan, rather than a broader war against the Taliban, the radical Islamist movement that ruled Afghanistan for years and provided a haven to al Qaeda's Osama bin Laden. Their reasoning: The larger threat to America remains al Qaeda, not the Taliban; so, best not to get embroiled in a local war that history suggests may be unwinnable." [!!]

It sounds like the administration is considering making a deal with the Taliban: The US will leave them alone if they agree to keep al Qaeda out of the Afghanistan. (Afghan President Karzai take note: all of this is going on behind your back, and much of it has your back as the target.)

Would this new approach work? Probably not. To keep al Qaeda out of Afghanistan is virtually un-do-able given the terrain of the area. Plus the idea of missile strikes and covert action to control or defeat al Qaeda is nonsense.

But this approach would buy some time for Obama, which is what he has been trying to do all along. Obama wants Afghanistan on the back burner so he can deal with health care, financial reform, Iran, Israel, etc.

One difficulty: Israel will not like it. Anything that reduces American strength or presence in the Arab east will be seen by the Israelis as a big problem.